Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development
Advanced technology is changing the world, and with the advent of the smart phones and computers, many people's interactions have been made easier. This transition from traditional relationship ways to modern methods has had a lot of advantageous for the humans. In this essay, it will be discussed how these state-of-the-art technologies could positively affect on quantity and quality of the people relationships.
Todays, compared to last century, people could interact with each other very easy. For instance, in the beginning of the 20th century, it was completely common that people write the letters and send them. Sometimes one letter is received after several months and it was probable that the novelty of information would vanish, but today's people send their letters electronically by means of modern devices. For the sake of this development, they could transfer their messages in a few seconds. Therefore, it is indisputable that the technology promotes the quality of the communications methods in which people make by virtue of decreasing time consumption.
On the other hand, nowadays, people especially young's, prefer to be in tune with the Internet rather than usage of radio or TV programs. As an example, they could find last news as soon as possible at the push of the button. It is a unique opportunity in which technology offers the humans. Thus, technology facilitates the flow and dissemination of information as well as the simplicity of access to data. It is unmistakably obvious that how technology could positively change our lives.
As it mentioned above, technological advancement has a lot of repercussion for people's communication. It could improve our relationship by reducing the receiving time of messages and by easy access to information. It is predicted that the quality of human's communication would be dramatically improved in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...f-the-art technologies could positively affect on quantity and quality of the people rela...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nication would be dramatically improved in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35353535354 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20412079218 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56228956229 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.479103726 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.375 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284279189723 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835986349963 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612982103183 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165228170409 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764486010949 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.