It is argued by many that, the government should spent more money on building railway lines connecting suburbs, while there are others who are of the view that, this budget should be spent on existing transport facilities. I find it more logical to endorse the latter view, the reasons for which will be enumerated in this essay after discussing both the views.
Firstly, one of the main reason why people support the prior viewpoint is that, tranin journeys are faster and more convenient then their counterparts. Today, trains only need a couple of hours to travel from one place to another, and also trains journeys provide people more comfort than the other means of transport. To travel long distances people only need to take a ticket and the train will take them to their destination without much delays. For example, bullet trains in Japan travels at a speed of 300 km/h and due to this, people prefer trains more. This is the main reson behind thr positive attitude of people towards trains.
On the other hand, I believe that this money slukdmeb spent on existing public transport facilities. This is mainly because, by improving the current transport system, traffic congestion will reduce to a great extent. Nowadays, in many countries, most of thr roads are packed full with private and public vehicles and as a result traffic congestion is inevitable. But, this issues can be ameliorated if the government decides to improve their public transport system and by doing this people will feel more comfortable to use these facilities. For instance, after the remodelling of the Swedish public transport system, the traffic congestion in many cities declined.
In conclusion, although spending money on rail networks can have some benefits, I believe that this is unnecessary, because improving existing public transport facilities are more convenient and effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...journeys are faster and more convenient then their counterparts. Today, trains only ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... take them to their destination without much delays. For example, bullet trains in J...
^^^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ir public transport system and by doing this people will feel more comfortable to us...
^^^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hese facilities. For instance, after the remodelling of the Swedish public transp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16339869281 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5991961086 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7901299052 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.538461538 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282366433746 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103892248784 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774788005447 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178528618821 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451782656267 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.