Nowadays, the public transportation plays an immense role in people life especially in the urban areas throughout the globe. Some people claim that it would be wise if government allocate considerable budget on building new infrastructure of new fast trains railway line that cut down the time of commuting. On the flip side, others hold the different view and assert that head of the states should spend that budget on refurbishment of the current publish transportation. As far as I am concerned, it is more viable if these two issues take into account simultaneously. I mean not only constructing new train lines should be a priority to the government project, but also boost to existing public transportation should be done are vital factor in easing people life.
On the one hand, these days people a large number of people living in the suburb work in the big and cosmopolitan cities, so they are urged to commute every day to cities. That is why, fast trains that ease the way people get to their workplaces every day is an important facilities. In addition, big cities are notorious for the intensive traffic congestion in the entry of the cities and in the evening when people from suburb want to get to work or come back home. For instance, Tehran is monster city that suffer from this catastrophic issue and even by widening of the high ways, government could not settle this problem.
On the other hand, public transportation such as subways, taxis, bus and so on should be serviced to be useful to the citizens all the year in the best mood. By the increasing the city population it is a must to strengthen the existing facilities otherwise the former public transformation that comes back thirty years ago could not provide adequate mean to communication all over the cities. For instance, prior to this, we had only a couple of subway line in the Tehran, while government took ling term action and it dramatically reach to more than ten subway line that connect all over the city from the east to west or likewise, from the north to south. That was because of the escalation in the population of the Tehran during recent decade.
To sum up all above, in my point of view, construction of the new generation of train line is mandatory since people are in need of means to commute to the cities more convenient. Similarly, maintenance and improvement regarding current public transportation should be done at the same time since population of the cities in escalating annually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trains'' or 'train's'?
Suggestion: trains'; train's
...building new infrastructure of new fast trains railway line that cut down the time of ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... On the one hand, these days people a large number of people living in the suburb work in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'facility'?
Suggestion: facility
...ir workplaces every day is an important facilities. In addition, big cities are notorious ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
... increasing the city population it is a must to strengthen the existing facilities othe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun subway seems to be countable; consider using: 'a couple of subways'.
Suggestion: a couple of subways
...or instance, prior to this, we had only a couple of subway line in the Tehran, while government to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: LING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'long'?
Suggestion: long
...ne in the Tehran, while government took ling term action and it dramatically reach t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaches'?
Suggestion: reaches
...ok ling term action and it dramatically reach to more than ten subway line that conne...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, regarding, similarly, so, then, while, for instance, i mean, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 429.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83682983683 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83943258505 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529137529138 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.9214788767 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262865065128 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817847889651 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641440522664 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153655324956 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588485264779 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.