The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping
Traffic, the result of the increasing volume of vehicles on the streets, is considered to be the major problem which cities now are facing with. Most people claim that only by reducing the demand in people’s daily routine for personal purposes can the traffic jams be solved. I completely disagree with this opinion because I firmly believe that there are probable solutions to tackle this issue.
Thanks to the Internet, the remarkable technological development, people no more be confronted with geographical and time barriers as they used to in the early times. A businessman, for instance, is able to run his business, to communicate with partners in other counterparts without being at a far-away location or different time zone. Likewise, interacting teaching, students can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Simultaneously, online shopping has offered a variety of choices for customers. In other words, without having people travel to fulfill their demand, the application of this technology has put a beneficial impact on traffic matters.
Nevertheless, the lack of freedom and social communication are reckoned as noticeable drawbacks, and some people believe that there are other practical methods which potentially address the traffic-related issue. The use of public transport provides a typical example. If the cities’ authorities enhance the use of buses, trains or develop a not road-based transport (such as sky trams or subways instead of private vehicles), not only will the traffic congestion be dealt but people will also be capable of sustaining their social interactions as usual.
In conclusion, I totally admit the importance of decreasing the demand for travelling from home to workplaces, schools, and shops to solve the current traffic situation. Besides, I personally think that there are more acceptable alternative measures to reduce jams on the roads.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43333333333 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08693303386 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623333333333 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8669161626 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.384615385 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251428224738 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810127543323 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747180299398 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155640746709 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585649565368 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.