Until recently, many tended to live in villages and they generally resent their life. However, at present time, a wide range of people are interested in living in a large city rather than small society.
There were 3 main benefits to living in countryside. Firstly, people usually knew and spoke to each other whether or not they got familiar before. As a consequence, inhabitants hold the opinion that they never felt lonely. For example, children played together freely without any restriction by their families, while they grew up being polite too. Secondly, living in small communities did not cause highly controversial beside developed cities. Lastly, spectacular scenery and rocky mountains surrounded by countryside which made residents acquiescent.
On the other hand, small society has drawbacks, in other word, we are fully aware that people those who want to make progress in their life conducted new opportunities for themselves. For instance, the majority of people may not be able to launched diverse products without high development tools. Hence, they decided to go somewhere having more facilities, including large factory, university and hospital which barely located near villages. Furthermore, a very point to consider is that no one can deny that transportation systems have not a great role in living on the outskirts. Consequently, it was highly unlikely to live there easily.
In conclusion, in my point of view, it was difficult to achieve success in small areas and people probably make some changes in their life. It means the disadvantages is fewer than advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...le usually knew and spoke to each other whether or not they got familiar before. As a conseque...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33992094862 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88128466299 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695652173913 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3333944954 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9333333333 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286939973707 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855155554053 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570593938637 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177160230727 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514994014965 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.