People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
While quality of life is scaling with time, many affordable commodities are found attracting market buyers. Although benefits can be tangible to people, there are still drawbacks with this phenomenon.
On the one hand, the provision of cheaper goods presents several advantages. In terms of economical merits to individuals, market with cheap stocks will enable customers to purchase their essential household equipment, therefore will provide a much more well-rounded lifestyle, especially with those with limited incomes. In comparison with Vietnam, most families could not afford a TV in the past, however, basic electronic household gadgets including television are now more than ever exceed what is considered as enough. With regard to positive impacts on society scale, the reduction in pricing goods resulted in boosting the purchasing ‘s power of consumers, which will eventually improve economic status. It is a common knowledge that market’s demand for products increases when commodities exorbitant prices are reduced. As the number of sold items soared, national economy will be fostered to become a prosperity, which will allow further advance on becoming an economical polar.
On the other hand, that reducing the price of commodities will gradually reveal the potential repercussions which will heavily prevent national development process in economical ranking and even other facets. First, with cheaper prices for products, industry managers and business administrators will have to focus on expanding their supplement in order to maintain profits. Product quality will lose its position as primary priority in manufacturing phase. Instead, quantity of goods, which has never surpassed secondary priority, is now the main aim of entrepreneurs. As a result, buyers will always have to confront with a potential scams or misleading advertises that many products hold. Furthermore, low quality commodities will lead to a deathly drop in the market’s demand in the long term. What really catastrophic is that with this phenomenon, an economic crisis may occur and its effect will cover globally. In terms of environmental consequences, many industries will undoubtedly sacrifice the long-term benefits of preserving concurrent environment to exchange for the short-term profits of cheaper materials cost by implementing a process without toxic waste and exhaust filter.
In my opinion, while our society is gaining some advantages when the market’s offerings become cheaper, the benefits cannot overshadow such drawbacks which can be extremely disastrous if underrated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...lly with those with limited incomes. In comparison with Vietnam, most families could not a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'common knowledge'.
Suggestion: common knowledge
...entually improve economic status. It is a common knowledge that market's demand for products ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, really, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, as a result, in my opinion, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78961038961 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02781840007 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625974025974 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2604684374 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.117647059 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6470588235 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0534401059971 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0195515212489 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293985164408 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0344446691536 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223435175213 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 78.4519038076 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.