Few people today understand the crucial role of natural environment to the existence of human beings. Although there will undoubtably some negative consequences of this worrying trend, solutions can be taken to mitigate these potential problems.
There are a number of reasons related to this issue, however, the main reason may comes from the fact that people nowadays are living with hectic schedules which prevent them from having time for activities such as finding information about natural world. Another reason is that they consider their current artificial lives satisfy and that living in natural habitat might be for prehistoric people, not for them who living in modern life. The final reason might result from the education systems as they now do not provide their students comprehension about natural world. The primary focus of current education systems is academic subjects such as Math, Physics,… and few lessons on environment.
Depend on each of the factor causes this trend, there are different solutions that could be taken to solve the problem mentioned. Firstly, educating children about the impotance of natural world in order to raise their awareness on environment. Secondly, city council should held several community talk about natural habitat or carry out environmental projects, competitions on finding about nature so as to grab the public’s attention, make them more interest in natural world. Finally, government should take action to bring green space to their citizens such as growing more trees along the streets, construct more green park in the residential areas so that people can live closely to the environment and appreciate for what nature gives them.
In conclusion, people’s poor understanding about nature result from various reason, however, there are a wide range of measures can be implemented to tackle this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 663, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
... academic subjects such as Math, Physics,… and few lessons on environment. Depend...
^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...s, competitions on finding about nature so as to grab the public’s attention, make them ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42808219178 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67287225774 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595890410959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3389975472 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.090909091 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41924230396 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14976882061 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878781098349 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246951808248 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559129876255 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.