People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world?
People currently seriously lack study related to the outside world. Two factors stand out being responsible for this failing, but there are steps which can be taken to remedy the problem.
People, especially young adults do not have a good grasp of natural subject nowadays. The first is at the workplace or at school; they regularly work indoors instead of taking preference to attend to extra-curriculum activities. For example, undergraduates rarely allow doing the research or experiments about nature by themselves. Therefore, it is undoubtedly that individuals no longer contact with nature as well as cannot answer when they are asked about the surroundings. Secondly, on the cultural level, some festivals connected with the natural world like spring or harvest celebrations are disappearing. In fact, young people tend to gravitate towards electronic media instead.
There are measures which authorities should take to deal with this issue. Firstly, youngsters must be encouraged not to squander their savings in terms of getting involved in voluntary environmental work. On top of that, the curriculum should be comprised of more study of nature and the environment and make studies after being brought in the lesson instead of only paying attention to references only. Finally, controls must be placed on how the media operates, particularly in the bombing field of online advertising. The government should curtail them and add more nature documentaries in the media.
In conclusion, there are some reasons why people today do not have a good sense of natural surrounding, and some measures could be taken to solve this problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39534883721 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95614237101 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647286821705 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8142053328 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4285714286 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278455101648 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845844517452 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548633987324 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160153640275 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415233023889 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.