As people live longer and longer the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality The idea horrifies most people yet it is no longer mere science fiction To what extent do you agree with such a procedure Have you any

Essay topics:

As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is no longer mere science fiction. To what extent do you agree with such a procedure? Have you any reservations?

The science of biotechnology has developed vigorously in recent years; one of researches is cloning human beings to supply organs for patients. Although this idea could be horrible to most people, but there are some evidences shows that this trend is feasibility. Personally, I agree with this development with some notices.
Nowadays, people live longer than in the past due to improved diets and advanced health care. But, this brings many problems behind it. As people age, their bodies become weaker and some organs need to replace. Thanks to advanced medicine and health, today replacing organs like heart or liver are becoming easily and common around the world. However, the availability of these back-up organs for surgery is limited due to huge demand. Therefore, if scientists could clone human bodies, the matter now will be solved.
However, the cloning humans could lead big questions that if these artificial bodies could have human rights as us, or if someone want to clone their death relatives, that is legal or not. These questions will be representative for these endless arguments. And before we have a fulfillment law for this matter, the acceptable thing now is that researchers could perform duplicating separate organs. This action I think will receive the support from all of criticism because it seems do not conflict to any ethic and moral.
In conclusion, the trend of cloning humans will become one of basic demands in near future, and I believe that this trend will be under control if we have enough knowledge and regulation to observation.

Votes
Average: 5.1 (5 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
... have human rights as us, or if someone want to clone their death relatives, that is...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10465116279 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60834282957 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62015503876 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6171400834 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0714285714 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169000420697 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548536581198 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394364375307 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100142577429 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031324097161 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.