At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Irrefutably, the population of a number of developed region are hiked in last few decades as a result a number of democracy chance to develop them. Always one coin has two side hence, Growing nation's with adults are more profitable aspects with how to manpower convert to the power of their region. This essay shed light on much more merits compare the demerits with suitable example of Oxford University and Asian nations.
To begin with, a plethora of nations have much more young citizen compare to the old human beings consequently, these nations are developed in short time than others. budding people freely adopt
knowledge than elderly ones. In these people pupils easily found resources of any items so mankind smoothly buy any product with cheaper prize. These community regularly develop their advance defense system with huge
citizen. Youthful Pupils adopt advance technology therefore they do smart business with other community. Youth brings an industrialization for growth of them and adults find loophole of slow and steady progress of their state while, ancient men work with ancient thought, and they fear to adopt the latest automation. For example, Oxford University state that the china has huge develop in last decades with youngster and their growing 25% faster the others.
To other side, there are few problems in populated democracy by immense of budding generations. Adult can not get a job smoothly so they are suffered from financial issues in their family. Government not easily provide
any service in these areas. Government focus on development of democracy so it not concentrates on older. To exemplify, Asian tribe have huge population as they need not provide proper service their citizen.
In final reckoning, I strongly advocate the former view of this essay younger one are more essential for every growing sovereign tribe. However, aged people are slowly growth of their community and it is useful for any states.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Budding
...re developed in short time than others. budding people freely adopt knowledge than eld...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in short, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2246835443 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54709487002 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579113924051 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5849574729 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1176470588 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158007739905 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474471613038 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303727214377 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723950172357 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431719019838 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.