Recently, the distribution of population by age has rapidly changed with the young comparatively outnumbers the elderly. Although this trend may cause harm to society in some aspects, its benefits in the long run should not be undervalued.
There are number of reasons why large number of the young acts as an incentive for the economy to develop. First, since the young is more active in innovation, the young employees seem to easier keep up with technology than the older labourers. For example, some occupation that is related to machine and assembly lines appears as challenges for the older people as it is hard for them to take advantage of technology. Second, older people often lose the flexibility in working which the young already has. For instance, some sort of work required working under pressure or even overtime such as nurses, flight attendants often seeks for the young workers.
Moreover, larger number of young adults can reduce the burden for whole society. In term of taxation, more young people will result in more employed workers and more taxes for government. These taxes may later make up for the public subsidy. Finally, young people can be the care-takers for the older one in the whole society. In reality, if a country is populated with higher number of old-aged citizens, there seems to be the situation in which the older has to confront with homelessness and hunger.
In conclusion, the outstanding number of young generations would efficiently force the economic development of countries. Besides, some social burdens including taxation and healthcare services can be minimized thanks to the contribution of young labourers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 657, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ants often seeks for the young workers. Moreover, larger number of young adults ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17037037037 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74782867266 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585185185185 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7717428073 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264262875474 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920316280731 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597995098424 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152611273404 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021785520537 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.