The professional workers such as doctors, nurses and teachers should be paid more than entertainment personalities. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
For many years, the distribution of country's wealth has been debated. Some have advocated giving highly qualified professions such as doctors and teachers high wages than actors or sportsmen. I completely agree with this notion for several reasons.
Nowadays, movie stars and football players are gaining much popularity and receiving all the attention either from public or the government. That is why they are paid high salaries compared to other people working in other jobs in the same community. That maybe due to the fact that these actors and sportsmen who are poorly qualified are considered as role models for many especially children.
Nevertheless, the vast majority of people think these stars are over-rated since they have no essential role in the country's renaissance. Conversely, health and education are the cornerstone in any country's development and prosperity. Accordingly, people working in these fields should be paid salaries higher than other fringe jobs for several reasons.
Firstly, health care professionals and teachers spend tremendous effort and long time to be highly qualified. Moreover, paying attention to these highly qualified jobs would encourage young generations to attain these prestigious jobs. For example, if doctors and teacher were paid high salaries, children would be encouraged to study hard to be qualified to attain these careers.
In conclusion, although entertainment may be an important aspect of our life, this does not justify paying people working in this field higher than other vital jobs. It is high time doctors and teacher were paid wages higher than actors or sports stars.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, conversely, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56746031746 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96607540372 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579365079365 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1877280614 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.214285714 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141022938751 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500068904806 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498756295667 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080476255955 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358454235729 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.