Recent research shows that the consumption of junk food is a major factor in poor diet and this is detrimental to health. Some people believe that better health education is the answer to this problem but others disagree. What is your opinion.
It is undoubtedly true that one of the biggest challenges we face today is how to improve eating habits which can immediately affect our health and fast food is considered as a main cause of ill health. While some people argue that high level of health education would lead to healthy and strong lives, I believe that it is not sufficient to solve the health issue completely.
There are a number of reasons why education about health seems to be an appropriate measure. There is a clear link between what people know about nutrition and what they are eating. In fact, people are easily exposed to a diversity of flashy advertisements of fast food restaurants, whereas accurate food ingredients and health information are hard to know. If children learned in schools about the need to have a lot of vitamins and minerals, they would be more likely to eat healthy meals. By contrast, people, who did not have any health education, tend to choose more junk food and as a result suffer from various diseases.
Better health education, however, is not a perfect solution as it ignores the wider social factors that cause people eat unhealthy food. First of all, many people take fast food, which is not because they are unaware of drawbacks of this food, but because they lead a hectic life. In other words, they normally do not have enough time to cook and sit down to a proper meal. Another reason of the popularity of junk food can be found on its accessibility and availability. This means that it is relatively inexpensive and can be found on every corner of the street. In my point of view, these social aspects might not be resolved with health education alone.
In conclusion, although improving the level of health education is a necessary action to deal with ill health, I would argue that we need a couple of other measures taking into account several social factors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76146788991 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57084890476 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562691131498 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3235121095 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.214285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275950714272 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914700470705 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470771904747 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163528375347 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314245891001 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.