Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
Owing to the fact of a communication, scientists are predicted about the people might use an amalgamation of language in the whole world in coming years. However, there are many pros and con's, in my opinion, notwithstanding, the positive development would take place the peak position because of the flexibility of interaction, enhancement of communication and so on.
Firstly, the most valuable benefit of same language is the distraction of communication barrier. In other words, people can often speak to anyone about their problem and express their feelings to alleviate inner stress related to any matter. For instance, as a medical practitioner works out their home town could interact with the patients who came to visit him for the medical advice without the detrimental effect on the language problem. Furthermore, economic and business growth of nations would increase as a result of common language. Such as, people can often think as united, incorporated and effectively as well. The inmate feelings of people would be the make use of intelligence and productivity, so that the import and export service will be hiked up in near future.
Secondly, to describe about the negative development like subside culture and diversity, and national celebrations. Similarly, ancestral custom and vibrations of local festivals might be mitigated by the influence of integrated language. Furthermore, every language have their own pride and variables, that would reduce too if the humanity spoke the same way of communication.
To sum up, integration of languages in all over the world would change the whole system of future. However, In my perception, the positive development would overcome the negativity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 781, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ervice will be hiked up in near future. Secondly, to describe about the negative...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41417910448 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11138323157 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.539410294 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.615384615 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13695364249 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453856061381 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295426482212 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804505528304 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226685360169 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.