Should people be discouraged to use cars?
Nowadays, cataclysmic environmental issues have concocted a heated deliberation among the public on how to attenuate them. One of the most suggested resolutions is to reduce car density on the avenues. To my knowledge, this approach will do wonders for us in many respects, not only environment.
Ostensibly, exhaust fumes and carbondioxide emissions derived from cars wreak havoc on natural habitats. These pollutants not only egregiously ravage people’s health to the extent where they have to succumb to diseases associated with high fatality risks but they also ineffably mar wildlife. Moreover, road building also results in deforestation, which can egg on the degradation of nature later.
While climate change is on the prowl, an avalanche of new problems arises. Gridlocks, traffic congestion and slippery boulevards can lead to abrupt accidents. Furthermore, cars are a mainstream product that could be cranked out at any given time, this indicates that an abundance of wasted materials or tattered fuselage is garnered during these processes and will create more landfills and refuse.
Yet, all the aforementioned repercussions don’t mean people should be banned from using cars, it just recommends they utilize public transports. As long as the government focuses on inventing environment-friendly cars and people centre on preserving nature, I believe we can soon work out the conundrum’s results.
In conclusion, instead of frittering away our time squabbling over the problem, we should take action forthrightly to ameliorate the devastated environment and improve the health of our community both for us and our posterity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22589522458 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.728 0.561755894193 130% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4396568853 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203159126116 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550820432441 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681351348397 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094365335451 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882400413315 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.