Should we discourage people to use cars?
The ubiquity of cars is putting enormous tension on cities to the extent where many people petition that this vehicle be out of commission. From my perspective, the widespread use of cars, if not banned, should be restrained in the wake of their self-induced demerits.
The omnipresence of this four-cogged transport has marginalized the yield of other vehicles; however, this prevalence only serves for detrimental repercussions. Not only exhume fumes and carbon dioxide emissions jeopardize any pedestrian and bystander in their locusts but they also accentuate the existing defiled state of nature. Moreover, cars are also culpable for accounting for 58% of accident-associated fatalities. Stoking oil into the already smothering flame, road building voraciously devours spaces initially tailored for forests; wildlife endures decimation while our life is just oscillated by these consequences like a pendulum hung in the air.
Nevertheless, the collective whole has now been aware of this issue and expressly raised their concern about it. They only paper over the fact because they have yet found other alternatives. Though the jury is out, the school of thought of environment preservation is still a silver lining. One more thing, the current pestilence has been recently confirmed to encourage people to use bicycles in the stead of their dominant counterparts, which is a beacon of the drastic shift in our society. In addition, to minimize the popularity of cars, more stipulations and ordinances have to be set in place and abided by strictly.
To encapsulate, we can’t procure any positive upshots or refrain commuters from driving cars forthrightly as it is going to be a lengthy process. Yet, should we join hands together and propagate useful information about the problem, more promising results are to come.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43356643357 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10380816355 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671328671329 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9012903076 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.538461538 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186277495146 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541937609827 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064463925091 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120592089553 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863677452952 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.