Smacking is the best form of disciple.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this
Corporal punishment is believed to be an effective style of instilling disciple. There are reasons as to why this pattern of correction is practiced, nonetheless this essay disagrees with the above statement and will highlight the reasons below.
Some people agree that the best model of the disciple in a parents' tool chest is smacking. They believe that this works because this steers the youngster away from negative attitude. They also say it is a natural method of correction, perhaps because they were spanked as a youth themselves, thus believing that sparing the rod spoils the child hence result to physical punishment as a reprimand for socially unacceptable action.
Contrarily, corporal sanction has three major drawbacks. Firstly, there is a high tendency of inflicting physical injuries to the adolescent which will only hurt and not correct. Another reason is, this could rely a negative message to the ward that spanking other people is an acceptable way to deal with strong emotions thus encouraging aggressive behaviours. In addition, smacking as a penalty for inappropriate conduct may lead to an even longer-term problem with children's health as they are more likely to have challenging adulthood like post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety or even depression. So, considering these reasons, this is in no way the most acceptable style of discipline.
To conclude, despite retro practices of physical discipline, this essay disagrees that smacking is the best mode of correction as it can lead to an undesirable performance in juvenile leading to an aggressive adult life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, thus, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38645418327 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98750061391 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629482071713 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4355774447 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.909090909 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181064690214 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620971578425 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581777540801 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107872832915 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170186553697 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.