The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that the authorities should not allow the widespread consumption of advertising on account of its uselessness. While I agree with this assertion, I partly believe that the upsides of TV commercial cannot be denied.
It is undoubtedly that society will reap benefits from curtailing the popularity of advertisement. Firstly, companies might spare no effort to convince consumers that purchasing things make them happier because the primary goal of advertising is to persuade people to buy products. Therefore, people will over-spend their money on unnecessary goal. Secondly, many large corporations aim their marketing at children because this age group is easily swayed by advertisements. Hence, the media skillfully employs market research to persuade teenage consumers to buy particular goods impulsively and actually put pressure on parents.
However, these aforementioned reasons can be seen as the opposite angle. One reason is that people who work in advertising are now unemployed without advertisements. In fact, companies also make less profit because of the reduced number of potential customers. Another reason is that lack of information about the products offered in the market, buyers would find it difficult to make buying decisions. For example, if there is no TV promotion, I do not know what prestigious sport shoe brands to buy because shoes with lower quality are currently omnipresent on the market. As a result, there are a host of issues with regard to the reduction of the media.
In conclusion, while the executive branch should offer policies of cutting down the booming field of advertising, I totally believe that its benefits are inevitable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...on the market. As a result, there are a host of issues with regard to the reduction ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06731188565 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655303030303 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0498836375 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148695676373 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437883015927 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350455818846 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735981650069 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288916120273 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.