Some countries build specialized facilities for top athletes to train instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that many nations have diverted substantial funding towards specialized facilities utilized to train sports talents and are indifferent to ordinary people's need with basic sports facilities. While the benefits of this trend are evident, drawbacks also need to be taken into consideration.
On the one hand, there are two main advantages with regard to this tendency. Firstly, giving top priority to these special facilites for athletes like arenas and sports gears could draw the attention of people. especially those have strong passion for sport and those sports talents. It means that these prodigies would feel that their homeland is investing in them heavily and therefore, they would do their utmost to make an outstanading contributions to national sport. Other benefit could be for the host nations themselves due to the fact that sportspeople could develop their skills to the full thanks to excellent working environment with state-of-the-art facilities. As a result, they could qualify for engaging in global sports events like Plympic games, bringing prestigious awards and raising their country's profile.
On the other hand, there are also numerous disadvantages if the governments and private sectors invest heavily in these facilities peculiar to athletes. One possible downside is that it could promote inequality among normal people who also need modern and user-friendly facilities to practise on a daily basis. It could even spark resentment and hostility if these basic necessities could not be satified. Another shortcoming could be that this trend would weaken and deteriorate resident's overall well-being and health seeing that they have fewer opportunities to take up their favorite sports and therefore lead a sendentary life, which is the precursor to many potentially chronic diseases such as obesity and diabedes.
In conclusion, focusing excessively on specialized facilities could bring both benefits and drawbacks for government s and each individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Especially
...ars could draw the attention of people. especially those have strong passion for sport and...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...selves due to the fact that sportspeople could develop their skills to the full t...
^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...among normal people who also need modern and user-friendly facilities to practise...
^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...spark resentment and hostility if these basic necessities could not be satified. Another shortcom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58881578947 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92407197853 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608552631579 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3808811447 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.692307692 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173815350626 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641260249758 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05588306962 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113792077251 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326716663472 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.