Some people are born to be leaders, others believe that leadership can be learnt. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Nowadays, leadership is an indispensable skill that help individuals achieve success. While some people reckon that this quality is achievable through training, I hold the view that it is rather innate.
Advocates of the idea that leadership is learnt believe that leadership is the combination of various skills and techniques which can be acquired through personal effort and training. Through series of hands-on activities and experience sharing sessions, professional programs would therefore provide learners with essential knowledge of different components of leadership. To illustrate, many management training programs, whose aim is to discover and nurture prospective leaders, have been organized by multinational corporations every year. Many fresh graduates enrolled in these programs, despite their initial dearth of management knowledge and skills, have been subsequently promoted to managerial positions later on in their career path. This has undoubtedly exemplified the perception that leaders can be trained.
Meanwhile, I strongly believe that leaders are inherited. Though leadership knowledge is of great importance, it is the natural quality and the distinctive capability of an individual that makes them an extraordinary leader. In fact, there is quite a number of terrific leaders who have not received any proper education in leadership. In the realm of technology, for instance, Bill Gates has successfully built up his own regime with his personal intuitions and visions in a unique way that has never been taught or mentioned in textbook or courses. Another example, Hitler, the notorious dictator, was not specialized leadership and yet, he was still be able to lead a troop of thousands of soldiers and conquered many continents during his time.
In conclusion, it is true that leadership constitutes a quite spectrum of different skills and therefore, one can be trained to become a leader. However, the inherent capability is the instrumental factor which distinguishes an ordinary leader with an outstanding one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to believe'
Suggestion: to believe
...s of the idea that leadership is learnt believe that leadership is the combination of v...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun management seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much management', 'a good deal of management'.
Suggestion: much management; a good deal of management
...omponents of leadership. To illustrate, many management training programs, whose aim is to disc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a unique way" with adverb for "unique"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ith his personal intuitions and visions in a unique way that has never been taught or mentioned...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...alized leadership and yet, he was still be able to lead a troop of thousands of so...
^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('quite') instead an adjective, or a noun ('spectrum') instead of another adjective.
... it is true that leadership constitutes a quite spectrum of different skills and therefore, one ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7003257329 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13403126327 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622149837134 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9481712568 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190739765806 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641782716434 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609638944359 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106689246595 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271495779669 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.