Some people believe that the best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that only small differences between the richest and the poorest members. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary settings, happy life is given paramount importance. Some are of the opinion that it is pivotal for people to narrow the gap between well-off and impoverished people to reach a happier society, others differ in this view. Considering this situation, it is crucial to explore this from two perspectives.
To begin with, there are several ways to produce a more enjoyable life, as the government plays a vital role in this inexorable changing society. To be precise, by providing free education to many poor people, this can help them equip with professional knowledge and skills, which helps them to seek job opportunities and encourages them to survive and thrive. Thus, people having good employment can receive a stable income. Therefore, the government makes a significant contribution to boosting people’s self-satisfaction and self-fulfillment. Moreover, people receiving free health care will enjoy effective and affordable treatment, thereby enhancing public health. As a result, building a harmonious society and people can live in a healthy life.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why reducing the difference between rich and poor member is the best way. To be specific, reducing the disparity among different social class may help people feel less discrimination among them. For example, if governor receives the same salary as a waiter who works in an ordinary restaurant, or millionaires share part of their wealth with jobless workers, these impoverished people will experience a more accepted and welcomed society. Consequently, enhancing social cohesion and people can enjoy this pleasant atmosphere. Besides, bridging this gap between rich and poor is a correct way to make fewer disputes and crimes among society. This is mainly because many crimes which target wealthy people will be reduced. As a result, this is. A practical, efficient and pragmatic approach to increase their happiness in life.
To sum up, it is apparent that rendering free education and sound healthcare by the government can increase the happiness of society. But, by no means, should we turn a blind eye on reducing the difference between the wealthy and the poor. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that free education and health care are the most effective way to increase social happiness.
- Most of the urgent problems can only be solved with international cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 83
- The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitoring program. Traffic calming was introduced in harper lane at the begging of 1999. 78
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies. 73
- Nowadays people prefer to shop in large supermarkets rather than nearby local shops. Why do you think this happens? Is this positive or a negative trend? 70
- The graph describes the changes in water supply and sanitation in urban and rural areas between 1980 and 1990. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38082191781 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00966105625 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572602739726 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7261249244 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138155529874 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429910623894 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440667401369 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086545227409 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016355593915 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.