Some people believe computers will take the teacher’s role, therefore, teachers will be replaced by computers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Computers have contributed to various aspects of our society, teaching in particular, they are even believed to replace teachers in the classroom. Although it is undeniable that computers have a big impact on teaching methods, I would argue that teacher’s role is the main key to the student’s success.
To begin with, teaching with the help of a computer maintains learner’s attention and offers them with a variety of learning styles. It is not exaggerate to mention that computers have been installed to enhance the lessons and keep student’s interests. With a wide range of teaching and learning applications, theories are becoming more attractive, therefore, learners are more engaging with the lessons. What is more, the online courses offer individuals to study at distance, which is especially suitable for remote places or low income families as these courses are accessible and cheaper. Topica, for example, a well-known education website, provides a multitude of courses for different age groups with a reasonable tuition fee.
On the other hand, the teacher’s presence at class is vital because teaching is not only about knowledge but about making students well-rounded; that is what computers cannot do. Firstly, teachers are well trained to understand their learners’ nature, and are likely to cope with different personalities and deal with the class with mix level of studying. As the result, computers long to adapt these matters because they have no feelings. Secondly, teacher’s hands-on experience is the real asset to students as they can learn from them, which is necessary for their future careers. Moreover, some teachers can inspire their students with their successful life, and become role models for them to look up to.
To sum up, it is irrefutable that computers play an integral part of teaching for a number of reasons; however, I have no doubt that they are unable to completely take the teaching job from the teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'exaggerated'.
Suggestion: exaggerated
...a variety of learning styles. It is not exaggerate to mention that computers have been ins...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in particular, no doubt, of course, to begin with, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34920634921 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02305577407 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9991410456 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.615384615 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06120827912 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179500470629 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703753713454 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507133857008 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115285929452 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698165178565 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.