Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a controversy that whether spending money on building train and subway lines or on building more and wide roads is the best way to diminish traffic congestion. Although each point of views has its convincing evidences, I strongly believe that the former is the best solution.
In the one hand, there are several ideas that why some people support to widening and opening more roads. Firstly, many roads in the cities are too small and under bad conditions. To bear up the rapid expansion of citizens, these roads need to repair or/and expand to the both sides; these actions will enable dwellers to move more easily, and reduce the traffic jam rates. Secondly, building up new road or even just repairing degraded roads would be the easiest solution to stop traffic congestion. In fact, in many countries, due to the limitation of the investment cost on the infrastructure, they have a little chance to think about new transport system like sky train or sub train. Therefore, the reinforcement of roads and investment new roads should be the best choice in this situation.
However, if the authorities and governments think carefully about their situation and their future, they might choose to execute sky trains or sub trains instead of carrying on aforementioned solutions. By doing these new transports, the current roads will be diminished by the sharing movement demand. In this case, people have more choice to select the kind of transports they will go. For example, to go to office, employees could go by train or bus if these stations are nearby their home. In addition, these new transport systems do not touch too much to the existing infrastructure; then all expenditures will be paid directly to new system, and the effectiveness of the investment will be higher.
In conclusion, investing to build new road and to expand road has some results, but I always support to executing new transportation as overall solution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98461538462 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80583331503 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563076923077 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7704462469 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266636246503 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916122016461 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104520091952 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180723710131 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110656001716 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.