Some people believe that governments should make investment in building public libraries in every town, while others think it is a waste of money because we have access to information via Internet. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is true that technology advancement has provided opportunities with people to read or study in various ways. However, I argue that the public library are still meaningful to maintain and have a huge value to invest.
On the one hand. Someone reckons that the library has lower functions in using and profiting. The digital reading product allows individuals to do some reading flexibly without going out. People are unwilling to find a specific place to study any more and public usage of libraries is much lower than the past. Besides, governments should pay more attention to the infrastructure. A limited budget plays a virtual role in public service economically while the library cannot bring the profit.
On the other hands, opponent, some educations hold the views that public libraries should be built in numerous town, because of the education and materials. The public managers have the obligation to guarantee the power of citizens to receive knowledge. Therefore, the value of public libraries in populating education cannot be underestimated. Additionally, a number of historical books are impossible preserved through the electronic reading. Furthermore, public libraries contain a wide range of materials available to readers.
In my views, libraries can benefits not only ourselves but also the society. The library is regarded as a mark of a city’s culture and inherit. Apart from this, it can also provide a chance for you to contact the real knowledge or history.
In conclusion, whatever the technology how to develop, the government always should do their job to ensure the meaning of the library.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntain and have a huge value to invest. On the one hand. Someone reckons that th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oing out. People are unwilling to find a specific place to study any more and pub...
^^
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'play'?
Suggestion: play
...to the infrastructure. A limited budget plays a virtual role in public service econom...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the library cannot bring the profit. On the other hands, opponent, some educa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nge of materials available to readers. In my views, libraries can benefits not ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contact the real knowledge or history. In conclusion, whatever the technology h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, apart from, in conclusion, in my view, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28076923077 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94548847678 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7204972784 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7647058824 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2941176471 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20623645439 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557144685078 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476607157685 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956457214384 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498564604789 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.