Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Many people hold the view that accepting an unsatisfied situation such as in job or in finance is necessary. While there are some benefits of this acceptance, I would argue that it is better for people to make efforts and enhance unacceptable conditions.
On the one hand, it is reasonable that accepting difficulties in real life such as working condition or finance teaches people many useful knowledge. For example, unwanted working conditions provide staff who work in there new challenging situations to solve. As a result, tackling a solution for difficult problem brings them valuable knowledge which cannot be learned in normal environment. Furthermore, people can learn how to design their lives that is suitable to the real life condition in shortages. With a low salary, in deeded, it is crucial to reduce consume for unimportant spending, in order to be able afford on the rainy days.
On the other hand, acceptance in poor situations in a long time can diminish a person's ambition and lose better chances. For instance, when an employee accepts working in an unsatisfactory condition, he must face low salary and limited new knowledge in a long time. Also, he may miss fortunes to alter his work condition to other environment with higher compensation and new potential position. Therefore, in similar cases, trying and improving unsatisfied situations takes a pivotal role in the process of boost a person's life.
In conclusion, although satisfying unwanted conditions brings people pleasure, making efforts and improving, in some particular situation, is inevitable to help any individual upgrade their life.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much useful knowledge', 'a good deal of useful knowledge'.
Suggestion: much useful knowledge; a good deal of useful knowledge
...ing condition or finance teaches people many useful knowledge. For example, unwanted working conditio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ituations in a long time can diminish a persons ambition and lose better chances. For i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... pivotal role in the process of boost a persons life. In conclusion, although satisfyi...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28185328185 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97976959649 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610038610039 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.6327871805 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216746881501 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810761577375 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808630838415 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137503739237 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941879057275 0.056905535591 166% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.