Some people believe the purpose of education is to prepare people to be useful members for society. Others say that the purpose of education is to achieve personal ambitions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Education sometimes is regarded as a method of society constructions by some educationalists while others reckon that it is a bridge for the youth to meet their goals. However I would argue that it is not a contradiction.
On the one hand, person with abilities play a vital role in the advancement of the society. Knowledge enables people to improve their practical skills and to broaden their minds to contribute their own effort to the country. For example, learning in school provides some people with opportunities to master some manufacture skills, therefore they may work in the defense department, assuring national security.That will truly give a sense of safety for citizens.
On the other hand, some people are strong advocaters of education’s function in pursuing personal ideals. Whatever males or females, they rely heavily on knowledge. Studying hard makes it possible for us to chase our dreams. For instance, if you want to be a lawyer, what the most important you should do is to learn the basic. Contrastively, if someone less concentrates on the study, he is likely to far away from his personal ambitions.
In my view, education benefits not only our abilities for society but also the skills of individual. Actually, the purpose of education is diverse and it can satisfy different aims silently. To be a big economist is a goal for many economics majors, besides, learning can help you realize your dream. Furthermore, an economist may also have an opposite effect on social economy.
In conclusion, we cannot figure out the real goal of education clearly, and they are both reasonable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is sometimes
Education sometimes is regarded as a method of society constru...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...idge for the youth to meet their goals. However I would argue that it is not a contradi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... argue that it is not a contradiction. On the one hand, person with abilities p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: That
... department, assuring national security.That will truly give a sense of safety for c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y give a sense of safety for citizens. On the other hand, some people are stron...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun concentrates is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rn the basic. Contrastively, if someone less concentrates on the study, he is likely...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... far away from his personal ambitions. In my view, education benefits not only ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an opposite effect on social economy. In conclusion, we cannot figure out the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08646616541 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0200795036 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9885911463 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293086660494 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752399500868 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589919062084 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131090048786 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299250273226 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.