Some people believe that the salaries paid to professional sportspeople are too high while others argue that sports salaries are fair Discuss both veiw and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that the salaries paid to professional sportspeople are too high, while others argue that sports salaries are fair.

Discuss both veiw and give your opinion.

Nobody can deny that players and athletes give such excitement and entertainment for people around the world. So, some people believe they are worthy of supports and paid high salaries. However, some people believe that sports players get a lot of compares to what they do. Although the sportspeople paid very well, there is a concern that should be spent on other people in society.

For people who are not interested in sports, they think professionals earn too much money. For example, football players earn enormous salaries by simply kicking a ball. Some of the players do not give a vital service. People think that all live happily without professional football. Moreover, it is more worthy of spending money on value terms such as improve education, build good transportations systems, or helping unfortunate people.

On the other hand, the salaries have given by professionals are fair for two reasons. Firstly, being a sportsperson or am an athlete requires a lot of time of practice, it takes years to become professional in certain games. Secondly, sport is a multi-million-pounds industry. There is a large audience of sports fans who willing to pay. For instance, sports channels cover the World Cup football. Also, television games and events attract many viewers around the world.

In conclusion, the reasons are mentioned for being that professionals' salaries are fair or not. In my viewpoint, I believe that sportspeople worthy the money for supporting them and promote the sports industry.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (4 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...mous salaries by simply kicking a ball. Some of the players do not give a vital service. Pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 195, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ney for supporting them and promote the sports industry.
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g them and promote the sports industry.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25819672131 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9703248786 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598360655738 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8220887995 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.4705882353 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3529411765 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29392120256 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892134970225 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615957547903 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17414668458 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443672155347 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.