Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior. Others disagree and think that local host country should welcome cultural differences.
Discuss both these views and gives your opinion.
The tourism industry is a global phenomenon today. Every country competes for each other to promote their unique resources. However, there are two arguments standing on how tourists should behave to their targeted countries. The first group thinks visitors should follow local customs, while others think reversely. From my opinion, visitors should consider both views wisely.
First think first, following others tradition could enrich our knowledge and develop our worldview. We do not have a complete understanding yet if we only study it from a book. The tourists must blend to the domestic custom, so hopefully, they can experience and feel about it. Wearing a hijab (veiling costume to all over the body except face and hand) is Arabic tradition. Women who do not practice it may argue that can alienate women freedom. Contrastively, after they experience and tray it they will sense of freedom and secure. This gaining understanding creates visitors becoming more tolerant person, so they cannot judge things subjectively. This blending system is a good approach to promote local culture due to the host country does not merely provide a better service but also a virtue of experience. As a result, the tourist may be addicted to visit.
In another view, the visitors must be treated as a king. Their desire mus be fulfilled. Once they are conveniently served, they will assume that this country is very polite and hospitable. As a result, the visitors must not take away their custom to attend to another country. They can still hang over even though the local custom itself prohibit their own society to drink a beer. I suggest this method resembles the colonial action where the local custom was raped and forced to fulfill the visitor's desire.
Above all, following another custom gives more benefits on both sides, the guest and the host. Contrarily, another view creates unequal interest. They give more credits on visitors but, in another hand, reduce a value of domestic custom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...s wisely. First think first, following others tradition could enrich our knowledge an...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, reduce a value of domestic custom.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11314984709 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52011518729 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626911314985 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5320103457 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.6956521739 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2173913043 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82608695652 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270119640092 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674677820693 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747691460661 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170044483086 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886824546253 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.