Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
The problem of disposal domestic waste has become serious so that some people argue making a law regarding recycling helps to tackle this phenomenon. I personally believe that the governments should impose laws and severe fine to ensure proper home recycling.
First, the global warming has increasingly worse such as melting ice due to increase sea level, changing seasons, the rising frequency of drought. By giving control to citizens, the global are able to deal with these as quickly as possible.
Second, the durability of practice is an important role in the issue. If they take action for only a few days, it is definitely useless. People tend to abide by rules through watching TV or newspapers temporary but they come back to originally life. On the other hand, once they are forced to laws, they discharge their duties. For example, when it comes to driving if they drive as their pleases, traffic accidents will grow out of control. By introducing speed violation, people will be driving carefully.
Third, it is helpful to promote one's awareness which makes people recycle. The general public might think "How serious does the government make the law?" After then, they try to minimise waste and save the Earth.
In conclusion, there are other alternatives that will make people recycle, but mandatory recycling is the quickest and easiest way. Furthermore, the most important thing is not one person's action but global action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ly. Third, it is helpful to promote ones awareness which makes people recycle. T...
^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...areness which makes people recycle. The general public might think 'How serious does the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, then, third, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17299578059 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60019706264 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.696202531646 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.382342482 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5714285714 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259852601136 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072229879789 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509211931941 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118575707752 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421653861289 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.