Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast

Essay topics:

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

It is widely believed that only a minority of households are involved in reusing the wastes. The proponents of recycling insist that reprocessing rubbish needs to be made legal by governments in order to increase the participations of families. I am totally in favour of this idea and this essay will put forward the reasons of reconditioning of insufficient litters from residences and the significance of imposing a law for remodelling debris.

First and foremost, recycling is economical. After being used, things often be thrown away while they can be recycled and reformed into the others for different aims. For example, when you have drunk a bottle of Coca Cola, then you send it to the factory, its materials will be used to make some new products. Recycling means making use of things and their components so that the national economy can save countless money and the resources will not be used up soon.

On the other hand, our environment is endangered. One of the main reasons is the waste itself. You can see on the TV thousands of poor marine creatures die from the rubbish under the water every year. Furthermore, we even have the waste "mountain" which poison not only our daily lives but also our next generations' lives.

As far as I am concerned, laws that making people recycling more of their waste should be passed as soon as possible because of the 2 reasons I've just mentioned above. There should be some strict punishments for people not following the laws.Supportes of this scheme claim that legislating tough and strict laws has always been more effective. Also, recycling need to be broadcasted in order to raise public awareness. Documentaries, movies and many TV shows as examples intended to inform residents of dire and degradable damages to natural ecosystems and human lives can readily awaken people towards considering the case.

In a nutshell, I strongly suggest that governments have a responsibility to enact laws and mandatory regulations. Still that should not be regarded as the mere solution. The most important depends on people's awareness.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...on as possible because of the 2 reasons Ive just mentioned above. There should be s...
^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Supportes
...ments for people not following the laws.Supportes of this scheme claim that legislating t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...o enact laws and mandatory regulations. Still that should not be regarded as the mere...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, then, while, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09537572254 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9944609562 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606936416185 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9081722549 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9444444444 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28593843729 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762138145334 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546661686188 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134532026676 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581905230318 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.