Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast

Essay topics:

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 250 words.

There is an ongoing controversy about whether the government should make the waste recycling a legal requirement for the residents. Someone disagree with this idea, claiming that it should be people’s right to choose their own waste management. However, in my opinion, I think it’s better for the government to make it a law for several reasons.

First, with the law, it is easier to manage the waste from domestic use. These days, the residential areas are scatter all over the city, making it’s harder to get the management done effectively. For instance, in the past century, people in Thailand tended to live near the rivers, but now people can live anywhere because there are sufficient facilities, such as water and electricity, available. So the authorities, who are responsible for waste management, have to work at many different areas, spending more time to deal with the problems. So, it would be easier for the government to impose the law about recycling the waste in order to reduce the authorities’ jobs that may cause by the complex urban area right now.

Second, resident’s recycling can create financial benefits to the country. Instead of investing on new waste incineration plants to serve the increasing waste from the increasing population, enforcing people to recycle their own trashes help the country save the costs. There was an report in Thailand about the waste problems in some area that the volume of waste that need to be eliminate is now exceed the incineration’s capacity, leaving the wastes unclear and creating the pollution to the city. This problem won’t happen if the resident is responsible for their own wastes. Clearly, it’s better to make the recycling the law requirement.

In conclusion, there’re many advantages of imposing the law about waste recycling. It makes the government easier to manage the waste and it has financial benefit to do so. Therefore, I am strongly convinced that law requirement for recycling the waste is needed.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'disagrees'.
Suggestion: disagrees
... requirement for the residents. Someone disagree with this idea, claiming that it should...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...e for waste management, have to work at many different areas, spending more time to deal with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...p the country save the costs. There was an report in Thailand about the waste prob...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'in my opinion']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233082706767 0.247107183377 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.16290726817 0.155533422707 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0827067669173 0.0946595960268 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0325814536341 0.0501214627716 65% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0375939849624 0.0437548338989 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.100250626566 0.122226691241 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0451127819549 0.0403226058552 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.02506404199 2.80594681477 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0426065162907 0.0326793684256 130% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.112781954887 0.0861772015684 131% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015037593985 0.021408717616 70% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00751879699248 0.011925033212 63% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2033.0 1933.35771543 105% => OK
No of words: 326.0 316.048096192 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23619631902 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20517956788 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.368098159509 0.374742101984 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.282208588957 0.28420135186 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.223926380368 0.203846283523 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.165644171779 0.137316102897 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02506404199 2.80594681477 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.037074148 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555214723926 0.56093040696 99% => OK
Word variations: 59.7606968139 60.7387585426 98% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.375 20.7743622355 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4182119254 49.517814964 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0625 127.492653851 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7743622355 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.814263465372 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 48.5958588957 49.1944974215 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.62365591398 1.69124875643 96% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458935816369 0.332605444948 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111693415053 0.102741220458 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0494077599789 0.0668466124924 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.60011682651 0.534860350844 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.095887054867 0.148594505496 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214660121177 0.134430193775 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604549327602 0.0742795772207 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.552735958416 0.324371583561 170% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0622187316861 0.0638462369009 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356988022045 0.228012699653 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250856041345 0.058150111329 43% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.5751503006 233% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.