Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
There is an ongoing controversy about whether the government should make the waste recycling a legal requirement for the residents. Someone disagrees with this idea, claiming that it should be people’s right to choose their own waste management. However, in my opinion, I think it’s better for the government to make it a law for several reasons.
First, with the law, it is easier to manage the waste from domestic use. These days, the residential areas are scatter all over the city, making it’s harder to get the management done effectively. For instance, in the past century, people in Thailand tended to live near the rivers, but now, as the city grows, people can live anywhere. So the authorities, who are responsible for waste management, have to work at many areas, spending more time to deal with the problems. So, it would be easier for the government to impose the law about recycling the waste in order to reduce the complexity in waste management.
Second, resident’s recycling can create financial benefits to the country. Instead of investing on new waste incineration plants to serve the increasing waste from the increasing population, enforcing people to recycle their own trashes help the country save the costs. As claimed in a report, the incineration’s capacity cannot cover the volume of waste needed to be eliminate, leaving the wastes unclear and creating the pollution to the city. This problem won’t happen if the resident is responsible for their own wastes. Clearly, it’s better to make the recycling the law requirement.
In conclusion, there’re many advantages of imposing the law about waste recycling. It makes the government easier to manage the waste and it has financial benefit to do so. Therefore, I am strongly convinced that law requirement for recycling the waste is needed.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231805929919 0.247107183377 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.172506738544 0.155533422707 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0700808625337 0.0946595960268 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0296495956873 0.0501214627716 59% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0404312668464 0.0437548338989 92% => OK
Prepositions: 0.099730458221 0.122226691241 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0539083557951 0.0403226058552 134% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.0116606527 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0458221024259 0.0326793684256 140% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.11590296496 0.0861772015684 134% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0161725067385 0.021408717616 76% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00269541778976 0.011925033212 23% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1864.0 1933.35771543 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 316.048096192 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23411371237 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.384615384615 0.374742101984 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28762541806 0.28420135186 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.224080267559 0.203846283523 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.170568561873 0.137316102897 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0116606527 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.037074148 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555183946488 0.56093040696 99% => OK
Word variations: 58.024458758 60.7387585426 96% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.6875 20.7743622355 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2008287198 49.517814964 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 127.492653851 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7743622355 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6875 0.814263465372 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 47.450041806 49.1944974215 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.58888888889 1.69124875643 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452868078849 0.332605444948 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113624222115 0.102741220458 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0524470261267 0.0668466124924 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.612273596409 0.534860350844 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0926545091895 0.148594505496 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213550039286 0.134430193775 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566984484756 0.0742795772207 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.539034034047 0.324371583561 166% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0587393082649 0.0638462369009 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348244492607 0.228012699653 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152964294319 0.058150111329 26% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.5751503006 233% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.