Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement,
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Nowadays, number of families who make waste from household are increasing due to lack of laws against waste from homes. Some people think that waste from homes need to be recycled. And they say that the only way to improve recycling among people is for governments should make it a legal. I am agree with this opinion and I think governments should be more stricter about this question. In this essay I will maintain about it.
To begin with, people start to do recycling when governments became more stricter and when introduce new laws against it. According to statistics, people begin to follow rules, when they break rules and when they pay taxes, therefore after one time which they do not follow to laws, they begin to recycle their waste.
Secondly, recycling is more important for our environment. A lot of things in the world are limited and in the future they will be finished. Recycling is helping to continue longevity of using these goods. For example, as a result of recyling in Kazakhstan save approximately one billion dollars.
On the other hand, creating new laws lead to increase number of corruption. It leads to rise number of crimes in countries which affected to economy of country. As a result of introducing new laws for road policy in Kazakhstan are increasing number of people who want to give bribe for policy.
To sum up, making recycling a legal have their advantages, such as people begin to follow rules and decreasing air pollution, and main disvantage like increasing level of bribery. However, in my view governments should make recycling a legal requirement for all people.
Comments
The world population grew
The world population grew very quickly in the last decades; as a result it is increased also the quantity of waste. Furthermore people are used to produce more waste than in the past because there is the tendency to throw away into the litter any broken or disused objects instead of trying to fix it like until few decades ago. To cope with this rising trouble we use several ways, including recycling, and some people argue that it should constitute a legal requirement instead of being at the discretion of people.
I believe that the legislation of this practice could involve more actively people to recycle their waste. Given that to the transgressors would be charged huge fines. As a consequence the law would dissuade them from transgressing.
Moreover if it the recycling were a rule imposed by the governments, the waste sorting would be better organized because they can surely provide more facilities and tools allocated to this goal than private firms or cooperation of single citizens could do. In addition everything that gets legislated is supposed to be regarded with more respect by people. Thereby it could carry out such as deterrent task because people would be afraid of not only breaking rules, but also of being judged guilty in front of the society.
In conclusion governments need to introduce laws for recycling in order to avoid any further future complications in this issue. As imposing this law they would make citizens more responsible and aware of the critical situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ste from household are increasing due to lack of laws against waste from homes. S...
^^
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...overnments should make it a legal. I am agree with this opinion and I think governmen...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stricter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stricter
...inion and I think governments should be more stricter about this question. In this essay I wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stricter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stricter
...to do recycling when governments became more stricter and when introduce new laws against it....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89051094891 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64763351642 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543795620438 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1004390944 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.75 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458297031548 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137944515139 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119998581202 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220860385713 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125093232534 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.