Some people support the development in agriculture such as factory farming and scientific
creation of new types of fruits and vegetables. Others oppose this view and support other
developments. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Agricultural innovations have been sparkling remarkble public outcry in recent decades. Although the advantages associated are pronounced, official authorities should prioritise other developments.
On the one hand, there are a host of benefits when it comes to agricultural developments. First, if some technological innovations are applied to agriculture, reliable crop-yields could be guaranteed. For example, thanks to the creation of genetically-modified organisms, rice and potatoes now can be resistable to harsh weather and arid soils, solving poverty and other food-related issues in many nations. Second, agricultural advancements could reduce the resources or monetary investments poured into this sector. For example, new automatic irrigation systems can minimize water consumption, considering traditional farms use about of 70% of fresh water supply.
On the other hand, official authorities should undertake initiatives to spend national budget onto other public sectors. First, governments should increase disbursements into transportation. This means that the betterment in transportation facilities such as the installments of super highways, public vehicles could act as a contributor to the decline in traffic congestion or even accident casualities, making transportation easier and more safety-oriented for commuters. In addition, investment outsourcing activities and capital free-market economy should be more incentivised for economic boom. Consequently, the emergence of multinational companies and corporations is inevitable, creating employment opportunities and more business and trading services, uplifting citizens’ living standards.
In conclusion, other developments related to transportation and economy should be prioritised over agricultural innovations. This not only ensures social cohesion but also the betterment in citizens’ living conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...pments. On the one hand, there are a host of benefits when it comes to agricultur...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.59362549801 5.12529762239 129% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.67309071104 2.80592935109 131% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677290836653 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.0457174901 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.214285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0967541099304 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320214579993 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0234269455458 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0606735360572 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197370468304 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 11.92 50.2224549098 24% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.65 12.4159519038 166% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.21 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.