Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The widespread university education has attracted massive concern for years in many regions and countries. When it comes to core study program, it is argued that whether students should choose their major based on interest or practical use. As a senior student at university, I believe that students should learn the subjects where they have strong passion.
It is obvious that useful subjects like science and technology play crucial roles in the development of society and higher quality of life as they can improve production efficiency in many sorts of industries. Also, the advanced medical technology offers people better health and longer lifespan. In addition, these subjects help to generate new green energy and reduce pollution, which contributes to a balanced ecosystem. Therefore, it is necessary to enroll massive professional students in these areas.
Majors such as science and technology are vital to the future of human beings, while it does not indicate that people should overlook other subjects, for instance, arts and humanities. There is no doubt that every field in society has its demand for professional staff. If students were only permitted to study a limit amount of subjects which are productive, there will be an enormous number of vacancies in the employment of other areas. Also, art and humanities which seem useless are equally important to society. Creative thinking is also a key in many jobs. Without the study in literature and art, less people will take jobs in cultural heritage and art creating, causing a negative impact in preserving the precious culture of one’s nation.
Personally, I believe that interest is the strongest motivation in one’s study. Students will be more likely to get tired of the lessons when they are forced to choose what they dislike. As a result, teaching resources and student’s time will be largely wasted both. This is certainly detrimental to personal prospect and university development.
In conclusion, to make sure that student can develop their own potential and to meet various need from employment in different walks, I am convinced that all of them should be entitled to free choices based on their preference.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ithout the study in literature and art, less people will take jobs in cultural herit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26345609065 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78834714914 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603399433428 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0622048626 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.222222222 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351916653799 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844119480423 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670158748734 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166113734492 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047235232823 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.