Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and

Essay topics:

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is undeniable that students should have genuine interest in the subject they study. Although many people believe that all undergraduate and graduate students need to have passion for the study they major in, few advises that only useful topics need to be taught at university level, special attention should be provided for science and technology related courses. According to my understandings, the later will cause problems related to unemployment and migration for a nation and so I will be disagreeing with the statement saying graduates need to study only useful subjects.

While there is a gaping need for doctors, engineers and leaders in developing countries like India, Bangladesh, Nepal and so on, not everyone needs to have similar profession for a country to become advanced in the world. Absence of good political leaders, teachers and businessmen is also not a good condition for economy of a nation. Besides, concentration on a certain sector will lead to unemployment issues. If most graduates turn to one particular sector, the employers will not be able to provide enough jobs for them. So, the unemployed ones might migrate to other countries as a result of the lack of jobs. Moreover, rest of the areas will consist of old people who are likely to retire as soon as possible due to the pressure of work. Furthermore, new and exciting technologies are being invented throughput the time. As a result, studying one subject that might be useful now, will not come in handy within next ten years. It should also be noted that none has similar interest and passion for a particular topic and forcing them to study something they do not understand or like may cause emotional stress and severe depression.

On the other hand, if youngsters are given freedom to choose what career they want to pursue, they are more likely work more diligently when they get a job and thus earning more money for the country. Apart from the economic balance, the state is less likely to face unemployment issues as well as migration conditions. Additionally, emotionally balanced citizens will be willing to carry out their responsibilities accordingly.

To conclude, although certain subjects are more highlighted in case of study or career, an overwhelming number of graduates from them are going to hurt a nation than do good. On the contrary, young scholar become responsible citizens if freedom is given to them regarding their own life.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nd migration for a nation and so I will be disagreeing with the statement saying graduates nee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, apart from, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06683168317 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83910243683 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571782178218 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5964440269 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.411764706 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.70588235294 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318742009869 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936692142997 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083852431502 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18518539675 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11811762233 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.