While many people say that students should only be required to learn about science and technology, others (including me) agree that they should be given the right to choose their favorite subjects.
On the one hand, it is undoubted that science-related subjects could positively change the future. To commence with, these compulsory subjects play a crucial role in the invention of cutting-edge technology. In other words, having gained a sufficient amount of scientific knowledge, collegians might be able to put them into practice. For example, at Hanoi University of Science and Technology, students have successfully invented the machine called “COVID-19 detector”, which can be highly effective in identifying people who are infected with the Coronaviruses in the community. Eventually, this state-of-the-art invention has contributed significantly to the struggle with COVID-19 of Vietnam. In addition, making science-related subjects obligatory in the university curriculum might also enhance learners’ job prospects. To illustrate this, within such prestigious qualifications of technology fields, the likelihood that students are recruited by prosperous businesses could considerably increase. For instance, such giants in the aspect of technology as Apple and Google strictly require their applicants to have good background knowledge of hi-tech to ensure the productivity of the whole corporation. Thereby, the variety of job opportunities that learning science and technology might bring for students is undeniably optimistic.
On the other hand, the idea of allowing students to choose their favored subjects, which I strongly side with, is also worth considering. To begin with, it would reduce a great amount of pressure placed on learners. To be more specific, as students can choose subjects based on personal preference, they would be more engaged in the whole learning process. As a result, rather than being dull, learning at university might appear attractive to students. Moreover, offering collegians a chance to attend their most-liked classes could improve students’ scholastic achievements. In terms of explanation, given that there is no obligation to learning, university attendees could invest more time and concentration on their specialization ones. This might promote students’ independence in learning, as well as their academic performances in the long run.
To conclude, while there have been large agreement on the compulsory of scientific and technological subjects, I strongly believe that students should be given the right to learn what they are keen on since it could raise their learning enthusiasm and academic results.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 853, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... academic performances in the long run. To conclude, while there have been large...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80710659898 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24367468199 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3782871947 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.111111111 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26358978139 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757158894131 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642567394231 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180874430044 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561689270247 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 853, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... academic performances in the long run. To conclude, while there have been large...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80710659898 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24367468199 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3782871947 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.111111111 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26358978139 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757158894131 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642567394231 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180874430044 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561689270247 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.