Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.

Educated people play a significant role in making the future of a country. Whilst some people are of the opinion that it is the student’s right to select their favorite major, others believe that this is entirely wrong and it should be obligatory to study some particular subjects considered to be practical and knowledge based.

On the one hand, personal fulfillment is known as an important aspect of freedom and should therefore be respected in a democratic society. It means that everybody has this right to decide about his/her way of life. On the other hand, it is claimed that success can be achieved by multiplying talent and effort. In fact, the less you are interested in your field, the more you are required to be hard working. There are some living proofs around each of us who have undertaken years training in a particular subject but discard their certification and come back in what they have always dreamed.

Those who disagree with mentioned opinion point out that spending money in the fields which may not be lucrative in the future actually is a kind of disinvestment. It is possible to live without for example experts in history, because there have been a large number of people investigating this subject before and picking up valuable literature about that, which seems to be adequate. Supporters of this policy argue that it is more important for a country to be updated according to latest technology by training new generation instead of spending time for repeated subjects.

I personally believe that elimination some majors from the curriculum of universities is not a professional policy and maybe leads to negative results in the future. Instead of that it would be more effective if government allocated considerable scholarship for dissertation based on scientific research. For example local industries should be forced to support students by providing a grant. In addition other subjects not being useful for the future should be restricted to private sectors.

To conclude with, by preparing appropriate circumstances for those selecting knowledge-based majors to study and not removing other subjects, a right balance between individual satisfaction and development of a country will be achieved.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rts in history, because there have been a large number of people investigating this subject befor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
...t for a country to be updated according to latest technology by training new generation i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...pport students by providing a grant. In addition other subjects not being useful for the...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in fact, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22928176796 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98214239856 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574585635359 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4680729591 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.2 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311609770274 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970929013563 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779226844042 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174391789506 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690636406825 0.056905535591 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.