Some people believed that by giving longer sentence to offenders could effectively reduce crime, in contrast, others think that it is actually counterproductive. And I tend to agree with the latter.
To a certain degree, server punishments like longer sentence could help to reduce crime rate. If the federal government rise the sentence term for trivial crimes, some potential offender may weigh their choices and choose to avoid commit a crime as the cost of crime has gone up. For example, a pocket picker have to think twice if the punishment become as serve as robbing and my change his career as the risk of being a thief is way out of control. That is to say, giving longer sentence could help to reduce trivial crime like pocket picking.
However, it is more reasonable to consider that punishment is not the key to eliminate crime, as the second view shows. In a real life situation, criminals may not take into the consequences of their action into consideration before they broke the law. For instance, it would not make much difference to bank robbers whether they are going to be jailed for 25 years or 30 years, their will to rob a bank is not dependent on the punishment because they normally choose to run away from justice. So, in this case, loner sentence cannot reduce crime whatsoever.
In my opinion, the impact of giving more server punishment is limited. At the meantime, more effective ways such as community services and provide better education for citizens probably are better method to eliminate crime from the origin.
To summarize, I tend to agree with the second view that bring longer sentence is not the best way to reduce crime, and there are definitely more effective ways to help the government to reduce crime rate.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, may, second, so, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, in my opinion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85099337748 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59000729747 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529801324503 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1941252449 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.692307692 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34731140587 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127830609143 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104811368759 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216590165848 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859674741 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.