Some people think the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentence. Others, however, think there are better alternative ways to reduce crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recent years have witnessed an increase in crime commissions, raising many questions of social soundness. Although the proposal of longer imprisonment sounds legitimate, many alternative measures could be taken with higher efficiency to reduce crime.
On the one hand, it should be acknowledged that giving longer prison sentence could reduce crime. Specifically, longer imprisonment is invariably associated with a longer time of undergoing harsh and insufficient conditions and heavy labour in prisons, eliminating any intent of recidivism. For instance, citizens charged with murder would never commit homicide as they will take long imprisonment along with solitary confinement, which is proved to culminate in many mental disorders into consideration.
On the other hand, official authorities should undertake more practical and effective initiatives to curb crime rates. First, the legislation of banning and censoring violent and X-rated contents on mainstream media should be enacted. It is implied that these materials could breed the future offenders in the future by reshaping their perceptions of moral codes, increasing delinquency rates followed by adult crimes in the future. Second, a higher degree of capital subsidies should be poured on an education sector to provide equal educational opportunities for every citizen irrespective of their socio-economic status. In fact, perpetrators of crime often lack working capacities stemming from not integrating into formal schooling and have to commit crimes such as drug smuggling and cyber-fraud to make ends meet.
In conclusion, despite the pronounced advantages pertaining to a longer prison sentence, it is not the best solution to reduce crime commissions. However, equal educational opportunities and negative content censorship on mainstream media would bestow more positive benefits in decreasing crime rates.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing and cyber-fraud to make ends meet. In conclusion, despite the pronounced ad...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92673992674 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11339366108 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644688644689 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2140670622 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.833333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195715134092 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785914280668 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823322973098 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129599699366 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477347590658 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.