Some people think that computers and the Internet are more inportant for a child's education than going to school. But others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some individuals these days assume that adolescence should use more computers and the Internet to study rather than going to schools. While I believe that computers and the Internet have certain benefits for their education, I would argue that schools and teachers are more crucial.
To begin with, there are several advantages that computers and the Internet provide to teenagers’ education. Firstly, since e-learning become popular, students can access an enormous data of lessons through computers. As a result, they can find self-pace learning convenience and flexibility. If they go to schools instead, they could be induced cramming for fixed exams. Secondly, authors who have online lessons do not have to pay several expenses such as rental cost, electricity cost as traditional education. This will reduce the prices of those online resources. Consequently, teenagers have to pay less money than studying in schools.
However, I believe that schools and teachers are more important for children. First and foremost, as adolescence study in schools not only academic knowledge but also empirical skills such as communication skill, presentation skill, schools will equip teenagers with necessary knowledge and make them be well-rounded and have comprehensive development. If the youth choose distant learning, they could lack teamwork skill. In addition, schools have not only academic pressure but also competition among students, which might lead to the students’ aspiration. As a result, teenagers’ academic performance might be better than distant learning.
In summary, while people tend to ecourage adolescence using computers and the Internet to learn, I would believe that it is more effective if teenagers go to schools and be taught by teachers.
- some people belive that schools should only teach children subjects which are benefitcial to their future career and therefore other subjects such as music and sports are not important.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Nowadays people always throw the old things away when they buy new things and we are living in a throw away society What fators cause this phenomenon What problem does the phenomenon lead to 34
- The unlimited use of cars may lead to many problems. What are these problems? In order to reduce these problems, people should be discourage from using cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below show current rates of secondary and higher education among people in various parts of the world Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...might be better than distant learning. In summary, while people tend to ecourag...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, in summary, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6468401487 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00336778855 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583643122677 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.8567214696 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.266666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268655932579 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959109590114 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098431197902 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18797375835 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643586009705 0.056905535591 113% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.