There is a global controversy surrounding the issue of the using animals in this era. Some people firmly assert that it would be wise if human take over animals in order to handling their tasks. On the flip side, others hold thoroughly the opposite view. To me, the idea of the latter party seems more appealing. In this essay, I am going to delve into both points of view.
On the one hand, when it comes to utilizing animals, every one recalls the former era when people didn’t have other way to perform their tasks. However, nowadays by existence of the technology, they not only don’t feel the need of animal, but people can also take advantage of more sophisticated means. For example, before this farmers mere laid on the sake of animals like cow and donkey in order to preparing their farmland, Although these days they could benefit the recent technology. So, the only fact that seems transparently viable regarding using animal is the provision of the food.
On the other hand, in favor of the second party, exploitation of animals seems an unfair attitude with respect to employing them for tackling overwhelming jobs. Nowadays, animals are abusing in different aspects. For example, there are several circuses throughout the globe that urge animals to do strange activities by considering food as bait. So, it would be distinctively viable that should have the opportunity to live properly in their homeland.
To sum up, in my point of view, government and people should have co-operation to make a world a place that human being live with animals in harmony. Though animals could guarantee the men food supply, in other aspect people should be really cautious regarding animals right in this planet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...regarding animals right in this planet.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, regarding, second, so, for example, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97586206897 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59141773895 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5813730795 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2808059991 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869226883448 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479975619504 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170862248734 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219483861373 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.