Some people think that it is the best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Dwellers have very different points of views about the ideal city for living. Some believe that the city which is expanded horizontally is more worth to live while others support the idea of the city which is vertically designed. Although each style has its own benefits and drawbacks, I would argue that the city which is horizontally built is better for settling down.
To begin with, a horizontal city has its own advantages and disadvantages. The most important benefit is individual will be living in a flat house rather than high building, which means that a house unit will have spaces for garden, garage, and playground for children. In addition, this kind of house creates more independent for each household because people do not live under the same roof with other families. Nevertheless, the horizontal style has troubles for a city lacking space.
The other style of city which is a vertical city, in contrast, be able to save space because the building will be built up to the sky. Moreover, the city authority can concentrate their concerns in the crowded city with high-density citizens. High towers with multi-function are also more convenient for consumers or workers. For example, the 101 tower contains lots of shops with diverse categories helps consumers easily find needed items and save time. However, high building brings the potential dangers for people living in if fire or earthquake occur.
In conclusion, both the city is horizontally expanded and the vertical one have their benefits and costs. Inspire of the drawbacks of horizontal style, I strongly believe that its advantages outweigh the disadvantages so that it is better to live in a city grows horizontally.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12903225806 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79308305154 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3671751525 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.214285714 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210397337815 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824917674018 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615666753944 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144212102306 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446975143239 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.