Living standards and styles have altered in many parts of the world in recent times. Despite some individuals argue that children are considerably free in today’s world, I completely disagree with this sentiment and would argue that children in earlier times were not as dependent as today’s. This essay will explain it briefly.
First of all, many children had economic independence in the past, yet children in today’s world depend generally on family. There were countless job openings available for children in many sectors such as agriculture and delivery in the past, consequently they were able to gain money to purchase must-have products. On the other hand, nowadays many young people do not work until they graduate from university so that they depend their family economically. Therefore, it can be concluded that children had too much economic freedom in the past.
Similarly, while in today’s world children are only allowed to play at home or at shopping mall’s playground, in earlier times children could play in all parts of their community with friends until night. For instance, an article by New York Times in 2019 in the UK revealed that more than 80% of children were playing in the park fifty years ago, while this rate dropped to around only 3% dramatically in 2018. Around 80% of proportion only have fun at home’s yard. Consequently, it is obvious that children’s play area has been largely restricted leasing to less freedom for them.
By way of conclusion, I totally believe that children were considerably free in the past due to financial income and large playing space, despite many commentators think that today’s children are more independent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, consequently, first, if, similarly, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17090909091 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7498555935 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6499866986 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217947099672 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756515057539 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049664089324 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120293057842 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421002287862 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.