Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for differents organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some people prefer to work for the same company throughout their working lives, others rather switch between diverse firms and thus get to taste a different work experience and various approaches from other individuals. I strongly agree that switching companies is essential for enhancing professional insights on different types of work tasks.
We must acknowledge that a teady work position may be convenient, specifically in terms of permanent income and stable workplace for both professional and personal development. However, this might not be sufficient for enthusiastic workers who aim for new opportunities to grow as well as for working themselves up to higher positions. Consequently, they lose motivation with the ever-lasting grind which awaits them. Moreover, working with the same people every day may lead to deepening relationships with other workers, though often disputes may occur as well.
Nevertheless, leaving a current job position can have a profitable impact in the long-run. Not only do you increase the chances of ridding your self of the stereotypical work environment that stiffles creativity and growth but you also broaden your experience as well as expand on your traits. Furthermore, continuing education in the work field provides new qualities and abilities which can be either challenging, exciting or practical and effective for further opportunities in other jobs. As a result, after the broad experience you will gain, you can truly and objectively choose what kind of job suits you the best and is the most lucrative among all.
To conclude, choosing the process of working is a matter of personal taste. Although I believe that trying different job positions provides crucial abilities and experience, some people will prefer to work for the same organisation all their working life and choose stability over dynamism.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, as for, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44673539519 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01437062253 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1054443704 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.083333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9166666667 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415967382467 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143432973951 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114736040268 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266767805962 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979525451721 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.