Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Different views arise as to which between for the same organization in their productive life and transferring from one to another is better for an individual. Others may say that staying in one place until retirement will show one's loyalty to an institution and will lead to better benefits not only for the employees, but for their families as well in the long run. Some believe that working in different companies lead to growth and expanding their horizons.
Loyalty pays; that is what most older people used to say when it comes to work. Many elderly in my family has stayed in one place for the longest time. They had practiced their profession in one company alone since they were childless until retirement. This, according to them led to better benefits such as big amount in separation pay, better compensation along-side tenurity and a clearer picture in promotion. Though, dedication is not enough to achieve this. Still, performance and workmanship is still the basis of anything.
Stagnation, a fear that came across the minds of millennials nowadays. Opportunities are everywhere, and by opening one's mind to wider horizons, you will be able to see that you can always learn something new. In this case, from a different organization, this learning maybe in different forms. First, some institutions offer free training/ seminar which will give new information and improve one's ability that is not presented by the previously affiliated company. Qualifications are a big plus in recruitment, when mixed with experience becomes a greater advantage for an applicant to land a job that will secure a good position, salary and benefits. It is more common for employees nowadays to view their company as a stepping stone and not as a permanent work zone.
To sum up, everyone wants the same thing; a life with no worries. They say "money makes the world go around". We work not ultimately for the experience perse but with the compensation that comes along with it. Better opportunities appear anywhere and anytime and for a person to claim it, he/she must be equipped with learnings and experience. Sure loyalty pays, but I believe that anyone must be more committed to the goal he has set for himself and less for the one he is staying with today. The only constant thing in this world is change. As the world turns, we must roll with it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...in one place until retirement will show ones loyalty to an institution and will lead...
^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'older' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: older
...horizons. Loyalty pays; that is what most older people used to say when it comes to wor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ity and a clearer picture in promotion. Though, dedication is not enough to achieve th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...h will give new information and improve ones ability that is not presented by the pr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, still, well, as to, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94736842105 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79884012958 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5664160401 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1166154014 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7272727273 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1363636364 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.86363636364 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270042756831 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704129374062 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774607975645 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169674555855 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845014331403 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.