Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, thanks to developed technology, university students are able to be taught via online lectures, which replace campus. Although this phenomenon makes them more convenient, it is not a true method of study.
There is no doubt that online class have a variety of benefits. Accessibility is a major factor in studying for students. People who are life in the remote area have difficulty in coming and going. By using this alternative, they don't have to be pressed for time. In addition, if there is a part that the students does not know, it is possible to listen to it no matter how many times. This can not be achieved in traditional class.
Yet, the traditional instructional method should not be ignored. The supervision system is not well organised since its implement is recent. There will be a possible that students are doing another action such as sending messages or even going outside during turning on the computer screen. Two-way communication is most important in education, However, there is a lack of interaction between professors and students because the online class is a program that students simply listen to. The professor has no way to whether they understood or not. In addition, it exists is likely to be hard in scoring the exam. If any presentation or debate it, they struggle to find students' capability.
The reasons mentioned above, I would argue that the traditional method should be maintained in order to smooth interaction between teachers and students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...factor in studying for students. People who are life in the remote area have difficulty...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... going. By using this alternative, they dont have to be pressed for time. In additio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, in addition, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07258064516 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86242613017 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604838709677 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8432715619 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.625 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104526845066 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329781806955 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462509452186 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651080461042 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051993997509 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.