Students leave high school without a good understanding of how to manage money. What do you think are the reasons? And give some possible solutions for this problem.
It is said that most teenagers graduating from the post-primary school do not comprehend accurately about financial management. This essay explores several causative agents of this as well as proposes the suitable solutions.
There are two main causes which lead to the lack of knowledge in organizing money effectively. Firstly, adolescents apparently are not responsible for earning cash, and then, they count on parents’ indulgence. Were high-school students to prefer buying a new thing, they would ask money from their parents instead of paying by their own. For instance, Iphone X, which is appealing, convenient and pricy also, was launched few days ago; many parents indulge their children’s demand by giving over $3000 in order to buy this innovation gadget. Secondly, in the post-primary education systems, there is no subject being relevant to money management. Because of focusing on study extremely impractical courses such as Literature, Art or Biology, students do not have any opportunities to be taught other realistic subjects, which are undoubtedly applied in reality.
There are not easy to solve the problem in financial management, but it is not impossible. Improving educational system in high school is considered as the first solution for this issue. The course “Use Money Effectively” should be added into the academic programs to encourage students estimate exactly the money value. Furthermore, both educators and parents are suggested to support their children to seek part-time jobs. By working hard and being reasonably paid, they can manage well their own money.
In conclusion, although majority of high-school students are not good at money control, it is absolutely improved by the supports from family and teachers. The successful cash organization is always vital, necessary and taken into consideration as the best lesson for students to achieve their future targets.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5612244898 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05903360754 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656462585034 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4520243108 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230154137658 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715795407959 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489180761159 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136781555826 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335865903896 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.