Television has changed the quality of life for the ordinary person.
Do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that broadcast plays an essential role in modern life especially, television which can influence on spectators’ worldviews by showing different variety of performances such as news, films or serials, and shows as an entertainment program as well. In fact, people “who are absorbed by these kind of television patterns” waste their most leisure time in front of the box instead of doing other beneficial activities for their both health and income aspects. In my opinion, I should support the statement because of following reasons:
First of all, the introduction of television has affected people’s attitude to their daily life activities, for instance, traditional behavior with its 24/7 process. As a matter of fact, people “when they have breakfast, lunch, and supper even at the family table in the evenings” can not stand abandoning television programs rather than talking over the day. As a consequence, the kindness among households is lessening.
Secondly, people have made an adaptation to be willing to taste whatever they are aware of emotional or romantic performance what they watched (wagued). Unsurprisingly, some particular films which consist of mentally extreme episodes or full of corruption, trouble-making episodes may lead people after them.
Finally, turning to convenient side of television can be found as many as sphere for example, people can be aware about the latest news even it has occurred another angle of the planet. Moreover, there are many sets which are related to encouraging people’s spirit. As for the positive side of television, I would point to a number of spheres where it has turned out to be quite beneficial
To sum up, I believe than television has managed to alter people’s lives both pros and cons sides by affecting reasonably as I pen down aforementioned reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... fact, people 'who are absorbed by these kind of television patterns' waste thei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich consist of mentally extreme episodes or full of corruption, trouble-making ep...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of, no doubt, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39661016949 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16644283721 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647457627119 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.6645658607 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.2 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 19.4 7.06120827912 275% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103748763308 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384781670909 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359367203019 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055224791054 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347032305224 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.