Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that the communication skills is decreased because of the lack of direct interactions when the increasing number of people uses mobile phones and computers. While I agree with this, I also believe that it is not suit for all people.
On the one hand, I agree that the overuse of private electronic equipment causes a variety of negative impacts on the ability of communication. Firstly, some people today are sending messages via email or sms instead of speaking, so it seems they do not need to say anything. That is a reason explains why they do not know how to read non-verbal emotional cues and eye contact, which can help their professional career in the future. Secondly, keeping eyes glued to screen of electronic gadgets results in decreasing the interactions of people. For instance, in many families, parents do not talk to their children enough and always care about news or films on the internet, therefore, children will be suffered from speech problems and have difficulties to learn literacy skills at kindergarten or higher education levels.
On the other hand, I believe that not all people using electronic devices will decrease their ability to communicate directly/ communication skills. Many young people can talk online with their friends for hours, and their stories are not boring. As a result, they can gradually improve their communication skills. In addition, online applications such as Facebook or Skype can encourage people to interact more frequently even with those who live far away from them. As a result, they will improve their speaking skills. Furthermore, when people live in foreign country, it is difficult for them to share feelings or talk to their family members without mobile phones or computers.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that the communication skills can be degraded when people are over reliant on computers and mobile phones, but this is by no means this would affect everybody's social development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d affect everybodys social development.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14197530864 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82363215864 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577160493827 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9699517519 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209144819699 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702656089878 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589270902358 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12724923844 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448778422838 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.